What illustrates the independence of the Superintendent of State Schools?

The independence of the Superintendent of State Schools is effectively illustrated by the fact that this position is elected by the people. This direct election grants the Superintendent a level of autonomy and accountability to the electorate, rather than being beholden to another governing body, such as the General Assembly or a board. When elected by the public, the Superintendent is responsible for representing the interests and needs of the community, which enhances the separation of powers and reduces the potential for political influence from appointed bodies. This design ensures that the educational policies and administration align more closely with the priorities of the citizens, reinforcing the independence of the role.

The other options imply varying degrees of dependence on other entities, which would not reinforce the role's independence in the same way. For instance, if the Superintendent were appointed by a board or elected by the General Assembly, there would be an inherent connection that could compromise the Superintendent's ability to act independently in the interest of the entire state's educational system.