Georgia Constitution Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Georgia Constitution Test. Dive into multiple-choice questions with hints and explanations. Prepare for your exam and gain confidence in understanding the Georgia legislative framework!

Practice this question and more.

Can the enumeration of rights be considered exhaustive in Article I?

Yes, it covers all political rights
No, it does not limit inherent rights
Yes, but only in context of Georgia
No, it cannot be amended

The correct answer is: No, it does not limit inherent rights

The enumeration of rights in Article I of the Georgia Constitution is intended to highlight specific rights, but it does not imply that these are the only rights held by individuals. The phrasing reflects the understanding that there are inherent rights that may not be expressly listed in the document. This means that the rights enumerated are not exhaustive; individuals possess various other rights that stem from their inherent dignity and humanity, even if those rights are not specifically mentioned in the text. This principle aligns with a broader legal philosophy indicating that just because a right is not explicitly listed does not mean it lacks validity or recognition. Thus, the Constitution acknowledges the existence of additional rights beyond those articulated in its provisions. The other options suggest limitations or a definitiveness that does not represent the intent behind Article I, further reinforcing the idea that the rights are not exhaustive.